HOME · FORUMS · ABOUT · LINKS · CONTACT US  
ABOUT PEOPLESOFT
What is PeopleSoft?
PeopleSoft Q & A
PeopleSoft&Oracle
Who is Larry Ellison?
PeopleSoft Modules
Oracle Modules
PeopleSoft 9
Project Fusion
 
TOOLS & TRAINING
Developer Tools
Consulting Tools
PeopleSoft Training
PeopleSoft Connect
Project Management
 
CONSULTING
Consulting Firms
Consulting Reviews
 
JOBS
PeopleSoft Jobs
Immigration (H1-B's)
 
OTHER LINKS
Forums
PeopleSoft News
Interviews
PS Gossip
Your Feedback
Friends of the Planet
Editors Blog
 

PSPlanetXpress
Newsletter

Please note that all fields followed by an asterisk must be filled in.

First Name*
E-mail Address*

Your e-mail address is secure. We will only use it to send you PeopleSoft-Planet related bulletins and information.

 
 

 

TECH TALK
Lightly technical observations on PeopleSoft and related topics

Kevin Reschenberg has over 20 years of experience in IT and holds an MS in computer science.  A former senior consultant and process specialist with PeopleSoft Inc., he now works with PeopleSoft customers as owner of Orange County, California-based SparkPath Technologies, Inc.

 

Oracle vs. PeopleSoft

Last week's court decision rejecting the DOJ's antitrust claims and clearing the way for Oracle to proceed with its takeover of PeopleSoft probably wasn't a big surprise to anyone, but it certainly is disappointing.

It's been 15 months (can you believe it?) since this started. At first, many of us didn't believe the offer was genuine. We assumed that Oracle was just trying to disrupt PeopleSoft's friendly takeover of J.D. Edwards (which didn't happen), or to disrupt PeopleSoft's business in general (which did). But if that was true at the time, it appears that at some point Oracle decided it really wanted to buy PeopleSoft and take out a competitor that Larry Ellison once claimed he saw only in newspaper ads.

There are still some hurdles for Oracle to clear, but this case was probably the biggest one. The DOJ could appeal the decision within the next 60 days. The European Union could reject the merger. I'll assume that neither of those will happen, or that even if an appeal is filed, the outcome will be the same.

Other cases are pending. PeopleSoft sued Oracle for $1 billion over its unfair business practices. That case goes to trial on November 1. Even if PeopleSoft wins this one and collects the money, Oracle could get control of the checkbook later anyway. $1 billion in extra cash might cause a blip in the stock price, forcing Oracle to raise its offer by a corresponding amount, but this all seems a little far-fetched to me.

Oracle has sued to overturn PeopleSoft's poison pill defense. This is a provision that allows PeopleSoft to create additional shares during a hostile takeover, instantly making the company far more expensive. That case is set to go to trial on September 23. This poison pill appears to be a strong defense, but it could crumble if the PeopleSoft board is under pressure to negotiate with Oracle.

There is actually another type of poison pill. This is PeopleSoft's very clever "Customer Assurance Plan", which promises two or more times a customer's money back if a takeover happens and support for the product is dropped within a specified timeframe. This deal was offered to new customers and was later amended to specify Oracle only (possibly to attract a white knight?). It has now created liabilities of $1 billion or more. Oracle's reaction to this plan has been interesting. While the company claims that it will support the product for 10 years, it's whining about having to pay out refunds under this plan, which is triggered only if support is dropped. Oracle also complains that the board is not fulfilling its duty to act in the best interests of the shareholders. Well, I think that this plan is great for the shareholders if it brings in new business, which it seemed to do very well. PeopleSoft could reinstitute this program at any time, and I hope that it does.

If Oracle can't get the board to drop its poison pills, it could launch a proxy fight to elect directors to the board. But once again, there is an obstacle. Even if Oracle could get enough proxies, PeopleSoft's directors serve on staggered terms--so Oracle could not take control in just one election.

Finally, Oracle needs to get the shareholders on board. Only about 10% of the outstanding shares have been tendered so far, and it's been a year of offers, changes in the offer price, and extensions.

Even with all of these obstacles, I'm very worried. Oracle could just go on spreading FUD in order to drive down the stock price. Everybody has a price, and the large institutions (including mutual funds) that hold large blocks of PeopleSoft shares don't necessarily care that Oracle wants to remove competition, shut down an excellent product line and fire lots of people. If that happens, I hope that Oracle is forced to pay a very large price.

Until next time...

  Email:  kevin@sparkpath.com

 


Archives

 SPONSORED LINKS


 

FIVE PILLAR CLUB


PeopleSoft-Planet.com is a  FIVE Pillar member site.

read more

OPTIONS

Give us your feedback

Send us your resume

Add to your favorites

Make your home page

To recommend this site to a friend, enter their email address

and then hit button to:

BOOKSTORE


Our r
ecommended reading this month is Understanding PeopleSoft 8 by Lynn Anderson

More Books

 
 

Barebones at the lowest prices


 

 


 
Trademarks referenced on the PeopleSoft-Planet website are property of their respective owners. Comments are property of their respective posters.
PeopleSoft-Planet is brought to you by Nnigma Inc. Web site code is Copyright © 2005 by Nnigma. All Rights Reserved.